Archive for the ‘ _Foundry general issue ’ Category

Nissan abrupt production halt

Nissan abrupt production halt.

TOKYO – Nissan Motor’s unexpected production halt sure looks like the ultimate supply chain screw-up, resulting in nightmares for OEMs.

Nissan’s delay in delivering engine control units (ECUs) also illustrates the market reality that many chips continue to be produced and distributed on an allocation basis.

This dilemma also sounds the alarm for companies who have shifted chip manufacturing to foundry giants like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. whose capacity is maxed out.

Nissan Motor Co. announced here that it is suspending production lines at four of the company’s five domestic assembly plants for three days starting Wednesday, July 14th, because ECUs supplied by Hitachi Ltd. won’t arrive in time.

The abrupt production suspension will cost the Japanese automaker its output of 15,000 cars.

Hitachi, obviously insisting that such glitches will not become habitual, claimed that the ECU delivery delay was caused by a shortage of one of the key ICs used inside its ECU.

While Hitachi is not naming names as to its chip supplier, the Japanese company acknowledged that it’s been dependent on a single source.

It’s not Renesas

One Japanese industry source told EE Times that the said semiconductor supplier for Hitachi’s ECU is “a foreign-based chip vendor.”

Renesas, a Japanese chip vendor originally created by Hitachi’s semiconductor division and that of Mitsubishi, which recently merged with NEC Electronics, offers a broad range of automotive chip solutions including control systems such as powertrains that control exhaust and electric vehicle cores in ECUs. However, a Renesas spokesperson, when contacted, said that their ICs are not used in the Hitachi ECUs supplied to Nissan.

The lack of ECU inventories that has triggered Nissan’s production suspension is an ironic turn of events for a Japanese auto industry that prided itself on “just-in-time” (kanban) system originally developed by Toyota.

Yasuhiko Honda, Hitachi’s executive managing director, said during the Nissan/Hitachi joint press conference: “We were informed by our semiconductor supplier of the sudden decline of a specific IC chip supply. The chip vendor, however, has yet to tell us what’s going on.”

While the executive noted that the tighter supply and demand in the current semiconductor market may have been the issue behind all of this, he added, “We don’t know for sure yet.”

The shortage of the chip has left Hitachi no choice but to delay ECU delivery. Those affected by Hitachi’s ECU in question are Nissan and two other Japanese automakers. Hitachi declined to name the two automakers, but confirmed that a majority of its supply is for Nissan.

Sourcing a specific IC from a single chip vendor is not uncommon among automakers, who are always seeking cost advantages. Nissan claims it will restore its normal production-level next week.

Meanwhile, Toshiyuki Shiga, Nissan’s COO hinted that a problem in procuring an ECU from Hitachi could spread to North America and disrupt production there, reported <i>the Wall Street JournalMi>.

EETimes.com – Firm raises foundry forecast

EETimes.com – Firm raises foundry forecast.

SAN JOSE, Calif. — Market research firm iSuppli Corp. has raised its revenue forecast for the pure-play semiconductor foundry market in 2010.

The firm has also raised its revenue forecast for all semiconductor foundry activity for 2010 to $29.8 billion, up 42.3 percent from 2009’s $22.1 billion. iSuppli previously predicted revenue would rise 39.5 percent this year.

By 2014, total pure-play foundry revenue will reach $45.9 billion, managing a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.4 percent from $26.8 billion in 2008. iSuppli hasn’t changed its forecast for capital expenditures by the foundry segment in 2010. iSuppli still sees foundries spending 123 percent more on capital equipment in 2010 over 2009.

“During the first three quarters of 2010, foundries were under intense pressure to meet customer demand,” said Len Jelinek, director and chief analyst for semiconductor manufacturing at iSuppli, in a statement. “The pressure is leading to increased revenue, as consumer spending has come back with a vengeance following a dramatic downturn in the fourth quarter of 2008 and for all of 2009.”

Foundry revenue gains to outperform semiconductor industry gains in 2010 – 5/12/2010 – EDN

Foundry revenue gains to outperform semiconductor industry gains in 2010 – 5/12/2010 – EDN.

Things are looking up – way up – for foundries. With foundry revenue expected to grow by nearly 40% in 2010, revenue expansion in the foundry business is forecast to outperform that of the semiconductor industry this year.

That’s according to a recent report from iSuppli Corp, which estimates pure-play foundry suppliers will see revenues in 2010 increase 39.5%.

The forecast expects pure-play foundry revenue to reach $24.8 billion this year, up from $17.8 billion in 2009 and up 24.6% from 2008 levels of $19.9 billion. By 2013, iSuppli said it expects foundry revenue will reach $35.9 billion with a CAGR (compound annual growth rate) of 12.5%.

Earlier this month, iSuppli estimated semiconductor industry revenue will rise 30.6% from 2009’s $229.9 billion to $300.3 billion in 2010.

“Lured by innovative new features and a renewed economy, worldwide consumers again are purchasing electronic products,” said Len Jelinek, director and chief analyst for semiconductor manufacturing at iSuppli, in a statement. “Unless conditions deteriorate once more, previously pent-up need for new consumer products will fuel foundry demand, iSuppli believes.”

ISuppli noted that growth won’t be limited to the leading foundry vendors but will also extend to specialty foundries.

The market research company reminded that GlobalFoundries in 2009 purchased Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing, a move that is expected to make the combined company the new number 2 player in the pure-play foundry market by the end of 2010.

The acquisition, said iSuppli, is just the beginning of the buying season among foundries. ISuppli expects a number of new deals to occur in 2010, some of which already have been announced, including the agreement UMC and He Jian Technology Co. Ltd.

The research company also sees several Tier 2 foundries examining the need to expand capacity. As many IDMs (integrated device manufacturers) look to offload manufacturing facilities in order to cut costs, many buyers could end up waiting for product

Korean chipmakers benefit most from recovery

코리아헤럴드 | 입력 2009.11.26 05:45

Korean chipmakers benefit most from recovery

The Korea Herald today publishes a four-page special report on Korea`s leading industries that have not only weathered the global financial crisis since last year, but also helped the local economy pull off one of the fastest recoveries in the world. – Ed.
By Jin Hyun-joo
Korean companies were latecomers to the global semiconductor industry, which was previously dominated by Japanese and U.S. firms.
The scene has changed, with Samsung Electronics and Hynix Semiconductors having grown fast to become the No. 1 and No. 2 memory chip makers in the world.
Their rapid rise resulted mainly from aggressive investments even during times of industrial downturn, which gave them higher market shares and bigger profits when the market turned around.
During the latest chip market slump, which is its worst ever, Korean companies invested in advanced technology to produce chips at cheaper costs, while their cash-strapped rivals pulled back.
As a result, Korean firms have widened their lead over their smaller competitors, and they stand to make the greatest gains from the industry recovery, analysts said.
Game over
“It requires more investment to advance technologies than it did in the past. Therefore, runners-up cannot endure such high costs. Korean firms will further widen a technological gap with their rivals,” said Kim Hyun-joong, an analyst at Tongyang Investment Bank.
He expected second-tier firms, mostly Taiwanese, would lag behind the race as they struggle to keep pace with technology development.
“The game is already over,” he said.
The global recession dealt a severe blow to the sector already suffering from overcapacity and price falls, leading chipmakers to post losses.
However, with their advanced technology and cost competitiveness, Korean firms have rapidly recovered from the slump and cemented their leadership while their rivals were still reeling.
Samsung and Hynix held a combined share of 57.2 percent in the DRAM market in the third quarter, up from 49.3 percent a year ago, according to data from iSuppli. Samsung controlled 35.5 percent of the global DRAM market and Hynix held a 21.7 percent share in April to June 2009. Trailing Samsung and Hynix were Japanese chipmaker Elpida Memory, with a 16.9 percent share and U.S. Micron, which held 12.7 percent, according to data from Samsung.
With the chip sector recovery visible in the third quarter, Samsung and Hynix logged profits, but their smaller rivals remained in the red or posted smaller profits.
Samsung`s semiconductor division posted an operating profit of 1.15 trillion won ($1 billion) in the third quarter, a sharp increase from 240 billion won the previous quarter and 190 billion won a year ago.
Samsung bucks slump
Samsung was the only semiconductor firm among the top 10 suppliers, which is expected to achieve growth in semiconductor revenue in 2009, according to a report by market research firm iSuppli on Tuesday.
Samsung`s revenue is set to grow by 1.3 percent this year, while global semiconductor revenue is forecast to tumble 12.4 percent, iSuppli said.
“Samsung is benefiting from its dominance in the memory market, whose performance was dramatically better than the semiconductor industry as a whole,” Dale Ford, senior vice president at iSuppli Corp. said.
“The company is the No. 1 supplier of both DRAM and NAND flash, the two largest segments of the memory market. Samsung managed to outperform the memory market partly due to its early leadership in new, higher-margin memory products, such as Double Data Rate 3 (DDR3) SDRAM.”
Hynix Semiconductors also ended seven straight quarters of losses and returned to profit in the third quarter, reporting an operating profit of 209 billion won during the July-September period, compared with an operating loss of 211 billion won in the second quarter.
Third-ranked Elpida also posted its first quarterly profit in two years in the third quarter, but its profit is a smaller 500 million yen ($5.6 million), compared with an operating loss of 2.3 billion yen in the previous quarter.
While Samsung and Hynix have started to produce DRAM chips based on more advanced 40-nanometer class technology and plan to increase the portion of the more powerful, cost-efficient chips, their rivals have yet to move to the 40-nanometer class technology.
However, some analysts raise concerns that the industry may face oversupply, as resurgent chipmakers are rushing to invest in manufacturing facilities. Market leader Samsung downplayed worries about overcapacity, saying cash-strapped firms would find it hard to boost investment aggressively.
“Chip vendors will increase investments because the market has improved, but the rise of investments will be limited,” a Samsung spokesperson said.
He added that the sector may see oversupply in first quarter 2010 because of low seasonal demand, but for the whole year the company sees little chance of a supply glut.
Non-memory challenges
But Korean firms, like their rivals, are exposed to the highly volatile memory chip industry. Therefore, they should expand their sales of non-memory chips, which are sophisticated and value-added devices, analysts said.
Although Korean firms hold unrivaled positions in the global memory chip market, they have a weak presence in the non-memory market led by Intel, Qualcomm and AMD. The non-memory market accounts for around 75 percent of the global semiconductor market.
Korean companies heavily rely on imports of system chips used in cars, home appliances and TVs. The non-memory semiconductor sector posted a chronic trade deficit since 2000, and the system semiconductor sector posted its worst trade deficit of $1.8 billion in the first quarter of this year, according to a report by Hyundai Research Institute.
“The major reason for a worsening trade deficit in the non-memory semiconductor business is that local companies have neglected investments in the field. In particular, for system semiconductors, enormous R & D expenses are required, and advanced countries hold key core technologies,” the report said.
Samsung is beefing up its non-memory business, focusing on eight LSI (large scale integration) devices including application processors, which are used in smartphones.
Kwon Oh-hyun, head of Samsung`s memory chip division, said last month that the company seeks to vigorously develop its non-memory business to drive growth and to solidify its market leadership in the memory chip business. The company wants to increase its semiconductor revenue by more than 50 percent in three years – to $25.5 billion in 2012 from an estimated $16.6 billion this year.
Knowledge Minister Choi Kyung-hwan said that the government will come up with measures to foster the non-memory sector.

EETimes.com – Foundry rankings: New firm emerges; Samsung, IBM lag

EETimes.com – Foundry rankings: New firm emerges; Samsung, IBM lag.

SAN JOSE, Calif. — Market research house IC Insights Inc. has released its rankings for the top 17 foundries in terms of sales in 2009.Most foundries lost share amid the downturn. One vendor, U.S.-based GlobalFoundries Inc., entered the rankings picture at the No. 5 spot. And the IDM foundries, namely IBM, Samsung and TI, lagged the field.

The pure-play vendors in Taiwan led the field. ”TSMC’s sales in 2009 were more than 3x that of UMC, which in turn had more than the combined foundry sales of Chartered and SMIC in 2009,” according to IC Insights.

”In 2007, SMIC moved past Chartered in sales and took over third place. However, with SMIC’s exit from the DRAM foundry business in 2008, coupled with Chartered’s acquisition of the Hitachi fab in Singapore, Chartered once again seized the third place ranking from SMIC in 2008. In 2009, Chartered’s sales were 43 percent greater than fourth-ranked SMIC,” according to the report.

”AMD spin-off GlobalFoundries acquired Chartered in 4Q09 and combined, would have had sales of just over $1.6 billion in 2009,” according to the report. ”The combined sales of Chartered and GlobalFoundries would have been just over $2.6 billion in 2009, enough to put the combined company’s sales only 8 percent behind second-ranked UMC.”

In 2008, the new silicon foundry spinoff from Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD) opened for business, disclosed its corporate name and unveiled its strategy. GlobalFoundries is a joint venture between AMD and the Advanced Technology Investment Co. (ATIC) of Abu Dhabi. Under the current plan, AMD owns a 34.2 percent stake of the foundry venture, while ATIC will own the remaining shares.

Last year, TowerJazz gained share. More than one year after buying Jazz Semiconductor Inc., Israel’s Tower Semiconductor Ltd.–or TowerJazz–is now taking steps to reach its two main goals in its ongoing turnaround efforts. It hopes to finally reach profitability and become the world’s largest player in the wide-open specialty foundry business in 2010.

The IDM foundries are lagging, including IBM and Samsung. For years, Samsung has been in the foundry business and claims it wants to become a major player in the arena. Samsung entered the foundry business in 2006 with sales of about $75 million. In 2007, it had sales of $385 million, according to IC Insights, although this was behind other leading IDMs that are in the foundry arena.

Samsung, which is spending a ton in R&D, was in the ninth place in 2009. Its 2008 foundry sales were $370 million. Its 2009 foundry sales were $325 million, down 12 percent.

Enclosed are the rankings. The rankings include the company, followed in parentheses by 2008 sales, followed in parentheses by 2009 sales and percentage growth.

1. TSMC–(2008–$10.556 billion)(2009–$8.989 billion -15%)

2. UMC–(2008–$3.070 billion)(2009–$2.815 billion -8%)

3. Chartered*–(2008–$1.743 billion)(2009–$1.540 billion -12%)

4. SMIC–(2008–$1.353 billion)(2009–$1.075 billion -21%)

5. GlobalFoundries–(2008–$0)(2009–$1.065 billion N/A)

6. Dongbu (2008–$490 million)(2009–$395 million -19%)

7. Vanguard (2008–$511 million)(2009–$382 million -25%)

8. IBM (2008–$400 million)(2009–$335 million -16%)

9. Samsung (2008–$370 million)(2009–$325 million -12%)

10. Grace (2008–$335 million)(2009–$310 million -7%)

11. He Jian (2008–$345 million)(2009–$305 million -12%)

12. Tower**(2008–$252 million)(2009–$292 million 16%)

13. HHNEC (2008–$350 million)(2009–$290 million -17%)

14. SSMC (2008–$340 million)(2009–$280 million -18%)

15. TI (2008–$315 million)(2009–$250 million -21%)

16. X-Fab (2008–$368 million)(2009–$223 million -39%)

17. MagnaChip (2008–$290 million)(2009–$220 million -24%)

*Purchased by GlobalFoundries in 4Q09.**Tower bought Jazz in 2008.

Foundry Future: Challenges in the 21st Century (Morris Chang 2007 ISSCC)

*********** Foundry Future: Challenges in the 21st Century *************

Morris Chang,

Founding Chairman, TSMC

— Foundry Challenge for the 21st Century —

• The foundry market segment is now an integral and symbiotic part of the overall semiconductor supply chain

• The foundry business model exerts a positive and important influence on the health of the overall IC industry

• The foundry segment must support the IC industry to maintain, or increase, historic growth rates

— Conclusions —

• The importance of the foundry segment to the IC industry will continue to grow

• Continued IC industry growth will depend on the sustained growth of foundries

• Foundry growth will depend on expansion into new CMOS – logic applications, and into non – CMOS markets

• Future foundry success will require the creation of much deeper and broader
relationships between the foundry and each of its customers

�Ŀ�帮��%20�̷�-21���⿡����%20����.pdf

EETimes.com – China could take a decade to double IC production, says SEMI

EETimes.com – China could take a decade to double IC production, says SEMI.

CAMBRIDGE, UK — A recent research by SEMI indicates China is committed to narrow the gap between its IC production and consumption, leading to doubling the country’s global equipment and materials market in ten years.Given the size of the gap and the current policy actions by both national and provincial governments, this means a growing equipment and material purchasing over the next decade.

In addition, new equipment purchasing by multinational chip companies with fabs or packaging and test plants in China will increasingly be made in-country by Chinese RD and process engineering staffs.

Since China surpassed Japan and the US in 2007 to become the world’s largest consumer of ICs, China policy makers have increasingly voiced concerns about the “chip gap” between supply and demand. In 2008, China consumed approximately one-quarter of the world’s ICs, yet manufactured only $5.6 billion in chips, enough to support only 8 percent of their domestic requirements.

By 2011, the China IC market will grow to $85 billion with domestic production expected to reach $8.2 billion, about 10 percent (iSupply, IC Insights, CSIA). By 2013, China’s share of the global chip market will reach 35%.

In the past, in markets such as computers, mobile phones, and automobiles, such an imbalance between supply and demand has prompted increased investments in local production capacity.

While some observers expected China’s economy to slow following the Beijing Olympics, or become increasingly susceptible to global economic shocks, the Chinese economy continues to growth at robust rates. The International Monetary Fund projects China’s GDP to rise 8.5 percent in 2009, despite the global recession, and growing at 9 percent in 2010.

The Chinese government unveiled a 4-trillion-yuan (US$586 billion) stimulus package in November 2008, with the funds to be distributed through 2010. In addition to investments in the macro economy, the Chinese government also remains the biggest investor in the semiconductor industry in China.

In the past five years, the China government influenced the investment of about $7 billion in new fabs. In the next five years, local government will likely continue to be the significant co-investor in strategic IC Fab projects throughout the country. Going forward, the central government may also invest up to $30 billion on semiconductor (semiconductor equipment and material are included), also software and high-end chip hardware industry by 2020.

The national government is investing in various VLSI equipment and materials research projects totaling $2.6 billion. In 2009, there were 54 projects involving process technology, equipment, materials, parts and other semiconductor manufacturing research funded by the government.

Focus areas included 90nm production, 65nm pilot line manufacturing, and 45nm technology, as well as other front-end and back-end manufacturing research through 2012. The National Science and Development Plan 2008-2020 will continue to focus on core electronics research, including software and increasingly high-end chip hardware.

The commitment to closing the chip gap will make the China equipment and materials market increasingly more important for global suppliers.

According to the SEMI World Fab Forecast, total spending on front end fabs (construction and equipping) in China will grow by about 67 percent in 2010 to over $2 billion. This includes new, used equipment and any self-made equipment purchased at over 20 fabs.

Installed capacity is expected to grow by about 10 percent to over 1.5 Million wafers per month, about 10 percent of all worldwide capacity in 2010. In 2011, the equipment is expected to reach $2.56 billion, according to SEMI 2009 Consensus Forecast.

In materials, China is projected to spend $3.75 billion in 2010, up 15 percent from 2009, surpassing Europe and nearly approaching the levels of US spending (SEMI 2009 Consensus Forecast).

Visit SEMI’s website

[디지털포럼] 팹리스 산업의 글로벌 생존법 – 디지털산업 경제신문 디지털타임스

[디지털포럼] 팹리스 산업의 글로벌 생존법 – 디지털산업 경제신문 디지털타임스.

[디지털포럼] 팹리스 산업의 글로벌 생존법

김경수 넥스트칩 대표

지난해 미국발 금융위 기가 모든 산업에 미친 영향은 산업과 소비 전반에 상상을 넘어설 정도의 심리적인 위축을 불러왔고 미래에 대한 희망을 두려움으로 만들어 버렸다고 해도 과한 표현은 아닐 듯 싶다. 또한, 실물 경제도 급속히 하강하고 있다는 소식을 우리는 매일 접하며 불황을 몸으로 느끼고 있다. 세계 경제의 불황으로 필자가 속해있는 팹리스 산업에도 위기가 찾아왔음을 몸으로 느끼고 있다. 그러나, 우리는 이러한 상황을 극복할 준비가 된 기업에게는 비약적인 발전을 할 수 있는 좋은 기회라는 것 또한 잘 알고 있다. 국내 팹리스 산업에게도 지금 이 시간은 한 단계 더 도약하는 좋은 기회일 수 있다.

우리는 전 세계 메모리 반도체 시장에서 삼성전자, 하이닉스 등이 세계시장 점유율 50%에 이른다는 뉴스를 종종 접해 메모리 반도체 시장에는 익숙하다. 한편, 세계 반도체 시장의 약 80%를 차지하는 거대한 시스템 반도체 시장에 대해서는 국내 산업의 세계 시장 점유율이 낮아 왠지 낯설기까지 하다. 그러나, 앞으로 국내 반도체 산업이 성장하기 위해서는 시스템 반도체 시장에서 시장 지위를 확보하는 것이 필요하다. 팹리스 산업은 이러한 거대한 시스템 반도체 시장에서 중추적인 역할을 하는 산업이지만 국내 중소 팹리스 벤처기업들이 약 1조원대의 매출을 올리며 간신히 명맥을 이어가고 있을 뿐이다.

국내 팹리스 산업이 발전하기 위해서는 인프라 구축이 필수적이다. 바로 파운드리, 테스트, 패키지 산업의 유기적 발전이다. 또한 시스템 반도체를 사용하는 완제품 제조 회사가 많이 있어야 하는데, 이 역시 국내에는 LCD, 휴대폰을 제외하고는 세계시장에서 경쟁할 수 있는 완제품 제조 회사가 드문 형편이다. 가까운 대만의 경우 이러한 인프라가 정부 주도하에 잘 구축되어 있으며, 시스템 반도체를 사용하는 완제품 제조 산업도 발전되어 있다. 그러다 보니 대만에는 2조원이 넘는 매출을 올리는 팹리스 기업이 있는 반면 국내에서는 아직 2000억원의 매출을 올리는 회사조차 없는 상황이다.

인프라 부족에도 불구하고 국내 팹리스 기업이 성장하기 위한 방법은 무엇인가.

첫째로, 국내 시장을 탈피, 해외 마케팅을 강화해서 글로벌 경쟁에서 승리해야 한다. 산업의 발전과 정보통신의 발전으로 지금 세계는 단일 경제권이 돼 지역, 시간의 장벽이 없어졌다. 글로벌 시장은 시장점유율 톱 3위 이외의 후위 업체가 생존하기 힘든 구조로 가고 있다.

둘째는 시장 규모가 크던 작던 한 분야에서 세계 최고의 기술력을 보유하는 것이다. 비록 시장이 작은 니치(Niche) 마켓이라 하여도 완성업체를 선도할 수 있는 제품 기획 능력과 기술력을 보유하고 있다면 어떠한 위기도 극복 가능할 것이다.

셋째는 팹리스 산업간 협력 할 수 있는 장을 만들어야 한다. 또한, 세계 시장에서 경쟁력을 확보하기 위한 시너지 있는 M&A에도 주목해야 한다. IT 기술의 발전을 통해 완성품 시장은 한가지 기술이 아닌 여러 가지 기술이 접목된 제품만이 경쟁력을 가지는 시장으로 진화하고 있기 때문이다.

대만의 대표적인 팹리스 기업인 미디어텍은 파운드리 기업과의 전략적 제휴를 통한 원가 경쟁력 확보, 대만을 벗어나 세계의 최대 시장이 된 중국 시장에 영업 집중과 요소 기술을 확보하고 있는 중소 팹리스 기업을 M&A 하면서 연간 매출 2조원을 올리는 회사로 성장하였다. 이러한 것들이 단기간에 이룰 수 있는 일은 아니지만 넓은 시야로 미래를 내다봐야 할 때가 되었고, 그래야 국내 팹리스 기업에서도 인텔, 퀄컴 같은 시스템 반도체 기업이 탄생할 수 있으리라 생각한다.

국내 팹리스 기업의 미래가 꼭 어두운 것만은 아니다. 국내 선두 팹리스 기업들은 LCD, 휴대폰과 같은 산업에 핵심 반도체를 공급하면서 경쟁력을 높이고 있고, 이미지센서(CIS), 시큐리티 산업 등에서도 점차 두각을 나타내고 있기 때문이다. 위기를 기회로, 대한민국 팹리스 기업들이 올해 세계로 도약할 수 있는 첫 해가 되기를 기원한다.

ATIC 회장 “사막에 파운드리공장 세우겠다” etnews.co.kr

대한민국 IT포털의 중심! etnews.co.kr.

세계 반도체 파운드리 시장에서 ‘태풍의 핵’으로 떠오른 중동 아부다비 자본의 행보가 거침없다.

지난해 AMD의 제조부문을, 올 9월에는 싱가포르 ‘차터드’를 각각 인수했으며, 최근엔 중동에 반도체공장을 세우겠다는 계획을 밝혔다. 세계 반도체 시장에서 경쟁할 수 있는 덩치를 갖추겠다는 의지로 풀이된다. 현재 파운드리 시장 선두인 대만 TSMC는 물론이고 2위권 진입을 노리는 삼성전자에도 부담스러운 경쟁자로 떠올랐다.

22일 업계에 따르면 아랍에미리트 아부다비토호국의 국영투자회사인 ATIC의 왈리드 알 무하이리 회장은 최근 열린 한 포럼에서 “앞으로 4년 내 이곳에 파운드리공장이 세워지는 것을 보게 될 것”이라고 말했다.

특히 “인프라 구축을 위해 미국 매사추세츠공과대학(MIT)과 긴밀히 협력할 예정이며 오는 2030년까지 아부다비 내 반도체산업 종사자만 4만명에 이를 정도로 키울 것”이라는 구체적 구상도 덧붙였다.

중 동 오일머니에 기반을 둔 ATIC는 지난해 10월 AMD의 생산부문을 인수하며 세계 파운드리산업에 혜성처럼 등장했다. AMD의 독일 드레스덴공장을 가져가면서 ‘글로벌파운드리스(Global Foundries)’를 출범시켜 단숨에 업계 3위로 뛰어올랐다. 여기서 멈추지 않았다. 지난 9월에는 파운드리업계 4위인 싱가포르 차터드마저 인수하는 데 성공, 규모를 더욱 키웠다.

인수합병(M&A)뿐만 아니라 막강한 자본력을 바탕으로 직접 설비투자에도 나선다. 글로벌파운드리스는 지난 7월 뉴욕주 북부에 최첨단 파운드리공장을 착공해 2012년 가동 예정이다. 중동공장까지 포함하면 천문학적인 투자를 하는 셈이다.

ATIC 의 공격적인 행보는 ‘스케일 게임(규모의 경제)’을 통해 세계 시장 1위 TSMC와 경쟁을 펼쳐보겠다는 의지의 표현이다. 무하이리 회장은 “앞으로 규모가 작은 파운드리업체들은 사라질 것”이라며 “우리는 2년 내 2위 자리에 올라 TSMC와 경쟁할 것”이라고 말했다.

업계에서는 ATIC의 2위 등극이 시간문제라는 시각이 지배적이다. 후발 주자들로선 생존을 위한 합종연횡이 불가피한 형국이다. 파운드리업계 관계자는 “특화한 시장을 개척하지 않는 한 규모가 작은 기업들은 앞으로 더욱 힘에 부치게 된다”며 “글로벌 파운드리의 부상은 합종연횡을 더욱 자극하게 될 것”이라고 전했다.

ATIC의 공세는 파운드리 시장 절대 강자인 대만 TSMC보다 삼성전자에 더 위협적인 요인이 될 것으로 보인다. 삼성전자는 파운드리를 세계 일류화 상품으로 선정, 해외 우수 인력 확보에 나서는 등 최근 의욕적인 사업 확장에 들어갔다.

세계 파운드리 시장은 지난해 220억달러에서 오는 2012년 320억달러로 성장할 전망이다. 일반 반도체 시장보다 높은 연평균 9%의 성장률로 성장세가 가파르다. 지난해 전 세계 파운드리 시장에서 대만 TSMC는 무려 102억달러나 벌어들여 독주체제를 굳혔다.

“반도체공정 32, 28나노로 전환시점 호기” – 디지털산업 경제신문 디지털타임스

반도체공정 32, 28나노로 전환시점 호기

via “반도체공정 32, 28나노로 전환시점 호기” – 디지털산업 경제신문 디지털타임스.

디지털타임스 | 09.12.16 08:32

“국내 팹리스와 파운드리 업계는 반도체 제조공정이 32, 28나노로 전환되는 시점에서 대만 업체를 따라잡을 수 있는 호기를 맞을 수 있지만, 팹리스 산업 육성을 위해 파운드리 산업을 육성해야 한다는 데에는 동의할 수 없다.”

15일 서울 양재동 엘타워에서 열린 시스템반도체포럼 조찬간담회의 연사로 나선 삼성전자 시스템LSI 사업부 우남성 부사장은 시스템IC 발전을 위한 시스템온칩(SoC)과 파운드리 방향이라는 주제 발표를 통해 이같이 밝혔다.

그는 미세공정 반도체의 전력소모를 낮추는 특수물질인 하이K 메탈게이트 관련 과거 대만업체가 40나노 진입에 어려움을 겪은바와 같이 28, 32나노에도 비슷한 사례가 발생 할 수 있으며 이것이 우리에게는 기회가 될 수 있다고 설명했다. 그는 또한 국내 팹리스 시장 지배력을 확대하기 위해서는 파운드리 산업을 먼저 육성해야 한다는 의견에 이견을 제기해 뜨거운 논란이 일었다.

그는 미국의 경우 변변한 파운드리 없이도 세계 유수 팹리스 회사들이 운집해 있고, 대만도 파운드리가 초강세를 보이고 있지만 팹리스 경쟁력으로 이어지고 있다고 볼 수는 없다고 해석했다.

그는 “파운드리 산업육성은 산학연관이 유기적인 협력체제를 갖추어야 하며, 외국 전문 엔지니어를 적극 영입할 수 있도록 정부 차원의 배려가 필요하다”고 설명했다. 반면 대만은 이러한 토양이 잘 갖추어져 있어 순수 파운드리 업체들이 큰 성공을 거두고 있다고 설명했다. 한국의 경우 삼성전자를 비롯 동부와 매그나칩 등이 파운드리 사업을 하고 있지만, 매출면에서는 대만과 격차가 크며, 파운드리 제조만 하는 독자기업이 없는 상황이다.

우 부사장은 “우리나라에 정통 파운드리 기업이 꼭 존재해야 한다는 주장에는 동의할 수 없다”며 “32, 28 나노미터로 전환되면 패키징까지 고려한 설계 능력이 필요하며, 이러한 면에서는 파운드리외에 다른 반도체 기술과 사업아이템을 보유한 기업이 더욱 성공할 수 있는 요소가 많다”고 설명했다.

이 같은 의견에 대해 국내 팹리스 기업들도 의견이 엇갈렸다.
한 업체 관계자는 “우리나라에 정통 파운드리 제조 업체가 없다는 것은 문제가 있다”며 “대만의 경우 반도체 산업 발전에 기업들이 각자의 룰을 정하고 기업간 협업을 통해 시장지배력을 확대하고 있다”고 말했다.

이 자리에 참석한 다른 업계관계자는 “삼성전자가 40나노이하 초미세 공정, 동부하이텍과 매그나칩이 110나노 이상 아날로그 및 전력용 파운드리에 집중하고, 하이닉스가 70~90나노대 파운드리를 지원하면 국내 팹리스 업계도 큰 불편함이 없을 것”이라고 설명하기도 했다.

한편 팹리스를 비롯 파운드리 산업 육성을 위해서는 정부의 적극적인 투자가 이뤄져야 한다는 의견도 제시됐다.

한 연구기관 관계자는 “내년은 반도체 업계가 가장 배고픈 해가 될 것 같다”며 “지경부는 내년도 R & D사업 등을 어떤 식으로 해야할지 아직 방향도 잡지 못한 것 같다”고 비판했다.

그는 “정부는 새로운 과제를 발굴할 것인지 현재 추진중인 사업을 계속 운영할지 등 구체적인 실행 계획을 조속히 마련해야 한다”고 덧붙였다.

한 중소기업 대표도 “현재 팹리스 기업 대부분은 상당히 힘든 상황에 와있는데, 정부는 최소한 이러한 기업들이 생존할 수 있게끔 자금을 지원하는 것이 가장 실질적인 대안”이라고 주장했다.

길재식기자 osolgil@

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.