Archive for the ‘ Uncategorized ’ Category

Advertise for pepsico


Would you like to make $300/week by simply driving your car, motorcycle, boat, Skateboard etc with a PEPSI logo on them to advertise for us? We are currently employing individual’s world wide to do this for us.

It is very easy and simple . Get back to us with your Full Name and Country to receive full details on this offer.

We will contact you immediately we receive that.

Thank You.

Mr Travis Blake
Advert Agent
PepsiCo Inc™
Los Angeles,CA ,90014



ITRS 2010 Update

2010 Update.

Dell MID/Netbook roadmap

SoC design in China and the future for 28nm – Practical Chip Design – Blog on EDN – 1690000169

SoC design in China and the future for 28nm – Practical Chip Design – Blog on EDN – 1690000169.

The state of SoC design in China is a difficult subject to research, but it is a question of vital interest to many designers and managers in the rest of the world. In recent weeks we have seen a couple of data points that suggest an interesting and fluid picture.

One point comes from Open-Silicon, which recently collaborated with two companies from the People’s Republic on a very substantial design. The chip was a 100 Mgate wireless networking SoC done in TSMC 65nm CMOS. Virtually all the RTL was developed at Open-Silicon’s customer, Shenzhen-based HiSilicon. The physical design was a collaboration between a team of Open-Silicon engineers and a team at Brite Semiconductor in Shanghai.

The second data point comes from Taiwan-based fabless ASIC house Global Unichip. Director of marketing Keh-Ching Huang says that the company is currently engaged in several 28nm designs planned for tapeout next year. Some of these engagements are with mainland Chinese companies.

“Chinese companies are very aggressive at 28nm,” Huang says. “Some have access to consumer-electronics distribution channels there. They are planning to open some new markets in areas like tablets and Internet access devices—products that will be China-specific.”

Some people maintain a stereotype that mainland Chinese companies are never quite ready for leading-edge design. But it is becoming clear that some teams in China are taking the lead on very challenging projects, from systems planning through detailed product definition and RTL development. Physical design and closure skills are just a matter of time. With their unusual access to capital, their growing skills, and their proprietary access to an enormous local market, fabless semi houses and systems vendors in the People’s Republic may be in a better position to exploit the advanced nodes of the future—28nm, 22nm, and beyond—than will be most companies in the rest of the world. That may not be how we are used to thinking about the semiconductor industry in China, but we’d better consider the possibility.

Is Motorola next in line to be acquired? | Signal Strength – CNET News

Is Motorola next in line to be acquired? | Signal Strength – CNET News.

Though it has plenty more customers, Motorola’s struggling handset business may not be as juicy an acquisition target as Palm turned out to be.

Wednesday, Hewlett-Packard announced it is buying Palm for $1.2 billion, bringing to an end what was once a pioneer in the mobile-computing space. HP executives made it clear why they found Palm so appealing: the well-reviewed Web OS mobile operating system.

The Motorola Droid

(Credit: Motorola)

For Motorola, the decision to focus on building smartphones powered by Google’s Android operating system could spell trouble for finding a similar suitor.

“I don’t think anyone would be interested in buying Motorola now,” said Frank Marsala, a research analyst at market research firm Gartner. “There’s very little intellectual property there. If they had a differentiated operating system like Palm has or their business was growing like some of its competitors that would make it much more attractive.”

When it comes to smartphones, software is the piece of the puzzle that is the most valuable. Apple has proven this with the successful iPhone. Mobile applications are what has been driving sales of that device. Apple has driven this market by creating a robust developer community and ecosystem as well as an easy to use online store for distributing those applications to consumers.

Palm released its WebOS operating system a year ago first on the much hyped Palm Pre and later on the Palm Pixi. The software has gotten high marks from reviewers for its capabilities and its interface.

For HP, which had said before it was looking for software to differentiate its products, Palm is a good a fit. It’s clear that HP saw value in the software itself and the ecosystem around it. The fact that HP was willing to spend even $1.2 billion on Palm, which was on track to barely generate $400 million in revenue this year, is further testament that it valued owning software versus licensing it or getting it free from Google.

Todd Bradley, executive vice president of HP’s Personal Systems Group, said on Wednesday’s conference call after the acquisition was announced, that HP plans to invest heavily in WebOS, increasing the already budgeted $190 million in research and development Palm was spending annually. Bradley said the company will use the software in several different types of devices, such as slate PCs, Netbooks, and phones.

The value in owning software is that it provides the company with more control. For example, HP will be able to dictate who can make applications for its devices. Controlling the OS also means that HP has more say over how the applications are built to ensure that hardware and software work together on the device. And it helps the company set its devices apart from the competition by offering different user interfaces and even different features.

Research In Motion, which is the No. 1 smartphone maker in the U.S., and Apple, now the No. 2 smartphone maker in the U.S., have been so successful in part because they make their own hardware as well as create and control their own operating system software.

Meanwhile, Motorola has been forced to take a different route. The company, which has struggled to find a hit phone since it came out with the Razr four years ago, is focusing on building phones using Google’s Android operating system. Motorola has committed to introducing 20 Android-powered smartphones to the market in 2010. So far it has already started selling eight new devices, including the Backflip, Cliq, and the popular Droid, which is sold exclusively for Verizon Wireless.

Android strategy appears to be working
The strategy seems to be paying off in terms of increasing smartphone sales. During the first quarter of 2010, Motorola outperformed when it came to selling smartphones, shipping 2.3 million smartphones during the quarter. Wall Street only expected it to sell 1.8 million smartphones. But overall shipments fell short of Wall Street’s forecast for total cell phone shipments. It shipped a total of 8.5 million handsets. Analysts had expected it to ship a total of 10 million handsets.

Smartphones are more expensive and generate more money per sale for Motorola. The average selling price of the company’s phones increased to $192 from $169 in the prior quarter. Analysts agree that Motorola is moving in the right direction, but they caution that the company still has a long way to go.

“Motorola’s handset business is in a state of transition right now,” Gartner’s Marsala said. “It’s selling more smartphones, which have better margins. But the legacy phones used to generate revenue. Until the company gets to a point where smartphones represent the bulk of their sales their business isn’t that attractive.”

Increasing the volume of handset sales is important for Motorola, which plans to split the company into two independent entities early next year. One business will combine wireless handsets and set-top boxes, while the other business will include enterprise wireless networking products and other commercial radio products.

There’s been speculation that once the company is split up that it will try to sell the new handset company. But given that Motorola is only expected to break-even in terms of sales by the year end, it’s difficult to see how it could command a high price tag.

“Motorola needs to get more work done on improving their business. And I don’t think Dell or anyone else interested in the company loses anything by waiting.”

–Mike Sapien, analyst, Ovum

“I’d say if it executes well all year, the value of the company at the end of the year could be around $3.4 billion,” Marsala said. “If this business were firing on all cylinders like Research In Motion where it’s growing 20 percent a year, I’d say it could be worth $14 billion.”

Mike Sapien, an analyst with research firm Ovum, said that the HP/Palm deal may prompt some companies to look at Motorola. But he doesn’t see anybody pulling the trigger on a deal until at least early next year when Motorola is officially broken into two companies.

“Motorola needs to get more work done on improving their business,” he said. “And I don’t think Dell or anyone else interested in the company loses anything by waiting.”

The company’s poor performance coupled with the fact that it doesn’t use its own software for its operating system puts the company is a weak position when it comes to shopping itself around. Following HP’s acquisition of Palm, other computing companies, such as Lenovo or Dell could be interested in Motorola. Lenovo had been rumored to be interested in Palm.

Dell may be a likely candidate to buy Motorola because Ron Garriques, president of Communication Solutions at Dell, used to be in charge of Motorola’s handset division. But even with this personal connection, it’s hard to make the case for Dell buying Motorola given that any company could build a smartphone using Android on their own.

“The problem with using Android is that you don’t control the software,” Marsala said. “I’m not sure what Dell or anyone else would get from buying Motorola. I don’t think the product portfolio and distribution is worth more than $3 billion when Dell is already using Android to build its own smartphones.”

Motorola’s co-CEO Sanjay Jha recognizes the value in owning the software that runs the company’s phones.

“Owning your own OS is important if you have the ecosystem and the ability to scale to keep up with leading edge technologies,” he said during the company’s quarterly conference call Thursday. “At some point, we could own our own OS. But for now Google is the fastest innovating ecosystem. It’s delivering very good results for us. And we are committed to it

Hp slate vs apple ipad image by geekdrop on Photobucket

Hp slate vs apple ipad image by geekdrop on Photobucket.

slates.png image by geekdrop

With Processor Speeds Stagnating, Researchers Look Beyond Silicon Toward Computing’s Future


Should silicon stay or go?

After a breathless race through the ’80s and ’90s, desktop computer clock speeds have spent the last decade languishing around the 3 gigahertz mark. That stagnation in processing speeds has prompted scientists to debate whether it’s time to move beyond semiconductors — and what better place to debate than in the journal Science? Ars Technica gives a top-down overview of several future paths laid out in the journal’s latest issue by researchers such as Thomas Theis and Paul Solomon of IBM.

The main issue comes from voltages being forced to scale down as ever-tinier transistors are developed. That can lead to heat and power use problems, as well as slower switching and clock speeds. Chips have typically compensated by favoring size and power over speed, but scientists suggest several possible new approaches.

Some argue that clock speed is overrated, and that most interesting future innovations will come from smaller, flexible electronics built into smartphones, medical implants or even Star Trek-style clothing. Silicon ribbons can already do this to some extent, as long as people can live with their lesser power compared to a typical multi-layer silicon microchip. Extremely simple and small chips could also do the trick without requiring serious reengineering.

The IBM researchers tout the idea of finding a new transistor switch that can amplify small voltage changes. One promising approach which could achieve that goal is "interband tunnel FET," which allows small voltage changes to maintain the necessary on-and-off states. But it only works with carbon nanotubes as opposed to silicon. Another approach would add a device that gives even small voltages an all-or-nothing impact — something that should allow for switching in less than a picosecond (one trillionth of a second), but in reality takes 70 to 90 picoseconds.

The last two ideas would move away from the old reliable silicon for semiconductors, and instead look toward transition metal oxide that combine oxygen with materials such as titanium and the rare earth element lanthanum. But there are so many transition metals and oxide combinations that researchers need a better way to predict the effect of any combos, lest they engage on a wild goose chase. We’ve also looked previously at studies aimed at using carbon-based graphene as a silicon replacement.

Material challenges aside, there’s reason for optimism. Silicon Valley hasn’t done too badly historically when it comes to cultivating a culture for innovation, and even the Pentagon’s DARPA has singled out the semiconductor industry as a model for others.

[via Ars Technica]

View article…